|
Job Hunting 101:
A Model of the Selling Process When the "Product" is You
In the
National Business Employment Weekly, the best single article I ever
read about finding a job began with a paragraph containing 100 words.
The first 99 were “no” and the 100th word
was “yes.”
The article
went on to explain that this paragraph is a model of the job-hunting
process. It also struck me as a model of the selling process and of pursuing
lots of other novel things worth achieving.
The
article’s author observed that most job-hunters mistakenly develop a
“conservative” strategy that they believe to be more “efficient” and
respectful of their limited time, their limited energies, and their finite
resource. But if their goal is to minimize the elapsed time required
in their search process, then, paradoxically, their strategy turns out to be
exactly the opposite of what they should be doing.
After a
handful of enthusiastic initial
“try-everything/respond-to-every-opportunity” efforts, most job-hunters say
to themselves something like “Hey, this is nuts. If I focus my
resources on qualifying opportunities more thoroughly before
I present myself at the door, I should be able to increase the probability
of being successful and really ending up with something that represents a
good ‘fit’ for my skills and interests and the way others are likely to see
me as an asset.” Flawless logic; lousy outcome.
Job-hunting
involves a process that satisfies all the criteria of being a complex system
(multi-variant, fluid interaction, not all factors being knowable; most
factors being well beyond the control of the “central” player, i.e., the
job-seeker). It is axiomatic that complex systems function
counter-intuitively.
Given this
insight (taken here on faith), it follows that one does not want to attempt
to focus on a specific type of situation or attempt to pre-qualify any
particular opportunity (what-the-hell are you really going to be able to
find out beforehand, anyway?) or even (dare one admit it to oneself?) try to
avoid being rejected once again.
Because you
cannot, by definition, have any meaningful information about just how long
the search process will take (absolutely the only thing you can possibly
know with any certainty is that when you have found the right “fit” the
process will be over), it follows that your only sound
strategy is to attempt to get rejected as frequently and as rapidly as
possible. Your “success rate” at being rejected constitutes the only
bona fide measure of your making true progress in the search process.
To grasp
what this means, start filling out the chart on page 6 (99 “No"s followed by
that lovely “Yes”). If you use this as a log of your activities and as
a guide to your strategy, it will also serve, automatically, as an index
(and as a concrete indicator to you) of your actual progress.
Trust me. It changes your whole outlook... makes you think straight...
turns you into a creative strategist again. And if you hit a rough
spot along the way, as Miles observed to Joel in Risky Business,
sometimes you just gotta take a break and say “Screw it! Ya
know?"
This "model"
of the job hunting process applies to "regular" selling as well (see Exhibit
3)
|