Blacklisted non-payers, SEO optimizers, Website
ranking services, Guest Post brokers
James David <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Brian K. Echol
Edwerd L Sherlock <email@example.com>
Paul S Landary <pauls.landary&outlook.com>
Oksana Obolenska, STF Medical
The list of
emails that are scammers:
firstname.lastname@example.org (15.06.2021 - PDF Format article)
Payer: Rashid Hashmat Al
i; SEO Marketer: Niko Kamryn <email@example.com>
You have a message from Rashid Hashmat Ali. firstname.lastname@example.org
Please reply as soon as possible.
The refund request is not fair becasuse the client justifies it
by lack of an action by Google that is not is not a part of the
The contact was implemented by us 100%. The sponsored article
sent by the client
"Successful Real Estate Project Management"
was published at this URL
and prepared for indexing by Google by providing 11 incoming
links, including one from the home page.
Indexing of new web pages by Google is managed by Google and
CANNOT be demanded from anybody else but Google. Google is NOT a
part of the contract and thus the demand for refund because
Google has not indexed the new page yet is absolutely unfair.
*** ESCALATED ***
This is unfair refund demand from a person who doeesn't want to
understand that the schedule Google indexing of new webpages is
managed by Google, not by us.
We did our job according to Sponsored Guest Post standards.
1. We published the client's sponsored article named "Successful
Real Estate Project Management" at our website here =>
2. We provided incoming linkss to the artcile to enable indexing
it by Google.
Now the client asks for refund from us because Google has not
indexed the article yet.
This refund demand is unfair because no one but Google can
manage process of Google indexing.
Google indexing of new pages take from 3 to 40 days usually.
As soon as Google indexes the article, the basis for this unfair
refund demand will be eliminated.
PS: We are on the market since 2001. It's for the first time
that we meet with such and unfair refund demand. Otherwise we
have millions of highly satified clients worldwide. Some of
their 'Thank-You' notes are published at this page:
VERY DANGEROUS PRECEDENT
Your decision to refund the buyer created a very dangerous
buyer complain looks like this:
"We demand refund because the Sun didn't rise at midnight".
The facts are:
Buyer didn't pay in advance, he paid after the job has been
done, so he knew what he was paying for.
We completed the job - published the buyer's article according
to the industry standards.
The buyer reviewed the job done and made the payment.
Few days later, the buyer demanded refund because Google had not
indexed his article yet. This is similar to demanding a refund
because the Sun didn't rise at midnight which the buyer expected
for his own reason.
SEO marketing is a huge $ multi-billion market. Most
transactions in market are done through PayPal.
By honoring this unfair refund demand PayPal will cause many
publishers to switch to different payment system (we'll publish
this amazing story at our popular websites and social media in
case this refund takes place).
Thank you for your additional consideration.